Technology Warranties: Vendors Find a Ready Market in Financial Institutions
- Date:August 30, 2018
- Author(s):
- Sean Sposito
- Report Details: 14 pages, 7 graphics
- Research Topic(s):
- Cybersecurity
- Fraud & Security
- PAID CONTENT
Overview
Over time, security budgets have diminishing returns. At some point, no increase in resources will reduce the risk of a negative consequence. That’s why cybersecurity insurance exists — to protect against the eventuality of a data breach. That’s also why some vendors have seized on the idea of guaranteeing the efficacy of their products through technology warranties.
To many, such warranties are a marketing ploy — a tactic meant to shift attention from a vendor’s competitors in a crowded marketplace. But to others, warranties are a sign that vendors are shifting their incentives — putting more than just their reputations on the line. This report will focus on the latter and attempt to elucidate the value of these warranties for both technology buyers (of a certain size) and sellers.
Key questions discussed in this report:
- What is a technology warranty?
- What is the value of such a warranty when backing a security product?
- What kind of FIs might find value in security technology warranties?
- How are these warranties being underwritten?
- And why are so few security vendors offering this type of added insurance?
Methodology
Javelin conducted a series of interviews involving insurance executives, cybersecurity vendor executives, and other relevant stakeholders to gain an understanding of the topic. Interviewees represented a variety of organizations, including those that have written technology warranty policies.
Data in this report is based on information collected in a random-sample panel of 800 information technology security decision-makers, 200 of whom work in financial services. For questions answered by all 800 survey respondents, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±3.46 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. For questions answered by all 200 financial services respondents, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±6.93 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. The maximum margin of sampling error is higher for questions answered by segments of respondents.
Learn More About This Report & Javelin
Related content
2024 Identity Protection Services Provider Scorecard
Javelin Strategy & Research’s assessment of vendors in the identity protection services (IDPS) market revealed clear pacesetters overall, led by Best in Class winner Equifax, and a...
Privacy and KYC Requirements: Navigating the Labyrinth
Data privacy and security are hot-button issues for consumers and regulators. FIs must balance consumer privacy with the need to collect information for regulatory compliance. Furt...
Customer Contact Centers: Heroes in Cybercrime Remediation, Fraud Prevention
Criminals increasingly use cyberattacks and scams to target consumers, and FI call centers are often relied upon for victim assistance. The key will be FI customer-oriented contact...
Make informed decisions in a digital financial world