2019 ATM Security: Taking a Holistic Approach to Protecting the Automated Teller Machine
- Date:February 04, 2019
- Author(s):
- Sean Sposito
- Report Details: 21 pages, 8 graphics
- Research Topic(s):
- Cybersecurity
- Fraud & Security
- PAID CONTENT
Overview
Despite criminal innovations, the simplest way to illegally withdraw cash from a bank is to exploit the weaknesses inherent in the business and operation of automated teller machines (ATMs). Whether criminals are organized internationally or domestically, the accessibility of mass-produced plastic cards, the limited number of ATM vendors, and a patchwork of fixes that safeguard devices in a piecemeal fashion have created the opportunity for prolific crimes.
Crimes at cash machines should be expected given the trillions of dollars dispensed from ATMs each year. A single cassette can carry as much as one million dollars in cash — amounts unseen in brick-and-mortar, retail branches.
This report will break down into two categories the risks that ATMs face: logical attacks that focus on the weaknesses embedded within the device’s software and operating systems, and physical ones that involve crooks breaking locks to cash dispensers.
Key questions discussed in this report:
- How great a role will ATM investments play in the business plans of financial institutions (FIs)?
- What is the state of the ATM threat landscape?
- What solutions best combat those threats?
- What obstacles exist to implementing those solutions?
Companies Mentioned: Apple, Bank of America, Co-Op Financial Services, FIS, Google, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo
Methodology
Javelin conducted a series of interviews involving industry and vendor executives, attorneys and other relevant stakeholders to gain an understanding of the topic. Interviewees represented a variety of organizations.
Data in this report is based on information collected in a random-sample panel of 800 information technology security decision-makers, 200 of whom work in financial services. For questions answered by all 800 survey respondents, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±3.46 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. For questions answered by all 200 financial services respondents, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±6.93 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. The maximum margin of sampling error is higher for questions answered by segments of respondents.
Learn More About This Report & Javelin
Related content
2024 Identity Protection Services Provider Scorecard
Javelin Strategy & Research’s assessment of vendors in the identity protection services (IDPS) market revealed clear pacesetters overall, led by Best in Class winner Equifax, and a...
Privacy and KYC Requirements: Navigating the Labyrinth
Data privacy and security are hot-button issues for consumers and regulators. FIs must balance consumer privacy with the need to collect information for regulatory compliance. Furt...
Customer Contact Centers: Heroes in Cybercrime Remediation, Fraud Prevention
Criminals increasingly use cyberattacks and scams to target consumers, and FI call centers are often relied upon for victim assistance. The key will be FI customer-oriented contact...
Make informed decisions in a digital financial world